Georgia Man Shops In JC Penney’s With Rifle Strapped To Back, Photo Goes Viral

· January 19, 2013

Riverdale Georgia man carries AR-15 rifle into JC Penney store to make point.. Now they are blaming Obama. How long would a black person last pulling this same stunt?

News around the web..

Discussion29 Comments

  1. MoorFedayeen says:

    @Hahz a black man already did this, at an Obama rally with a pistol and AR-15 so kill that noise. And I am blaming Obama, Biden and Hilary because aint nobody threatening our 2nd amendment but them. If I saw this dude I wouldn’t be the least frightened the way all these nuts are shooting up malls, schools and theaters. In fact I’d feel safer. An evil doer conceals his weapon before a spree shooting or robbery. This dude aint hiding nothing. More power to him.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63GiXzpfGhA

    • Bob says:

      Ok watch somebody just be brazen and waltz into the shop with their gun all out, you thinking it “safe”, and then blam! Game over. Guns are tools of war and savagery. In the bill o rights they said the word “militia” they were referring to military not some lone civilian nuts.

      I know you gun nuts don’t like to hear this but there aint nuthin civilzed bout guns, nuthin safe about guns at all. The more guns there are, the more danger there is. We live in a democracy, a bad one, but we at least live in one, so why we gotta fear “tyranny”?

      Freedom is great, but irresponsible freedom is disastrous. And many people ARE not responsible. Gun laws make it harder in general for people to procure guns not just law abiding citizens, that means even criminals will be hard pressed to land a gun.

      • Bob says:

        Ok watch somebody just be brazen and waltz into the shop with their gun all out, you thinking it “safe”, and then blam! Game over. Guns are tools of war and savagery. In the bill o rights they said the word “militia” they were referring to military not some lone civilian nuts.

        I know you gun nuts don’t like to hear this but there aint nuthin civilzed bout guns, nuthin safe about guns at all. The more guns there are, the more danger there is. We live in a democracy, a bad one, but we at least live in one, so why we gotta fear “tyranny”?

        Freedom is great, but irresponsible freedom is disastrous. And many people ARE not responsible. Gun laws make it harder in general for people to procure guns not just law abiding citizens, that means even criminals will be hard pressed to land a gun.

        • MoorFedayeen says:

          So @Bob you a liberal huh? And your argument is highly hypothetical, meaning it hasn’t happened. I’m hardly a gun nut but I’ll give you somethings that have happened in America.

          Tell me this Bob; why are the most violent places in America also the strictest on gun control? I tell you why. Because criminals and felons give 2 sh1ts about the law, obviously. Chicago finished the year with 500 murders FLAT & those clowns have some of the WORST gun restrictions in the nation. Coincidence? Ask Obama about his city and what so called control has done for them. He can’t answer. Hell, my democratic azz city had nearly 400 homicides in 2012 and they’re gun laws are only a little better in recent years. The damage has already been done.

          Point proven: Gun control is total bullsh1t and a direct sign of aggression from a govt that has tyranny on their mind.

          • Brotha Noompsey says:

            I agree 100% Moor. I keep telling far left libs at my job that the 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting or sport shooting or even a home invasion. It is all about giving people a fighting chance in case the government tries to impose tyranny on us.

  2. 808s says:

    Something ironic and humorous should have happened to him.

  3. Dawg says:

    some ppl are the worst

  4. DJ_Ace54 says:

    What an idiot…and Utah has dumb laws if open carry of assault rifles in private sectors is acceptable..

  5. Tim Tim says:

    Since this is a white dude this is all cool, but if this dude were black the cops would have picked him up just before he crossed from the boys section over to the men!

  6. NaledgeState says:

    @MoorFedayeen
    Tyranny? From who…Britain? Go back and make your comment relavent to the 21st century. It’s funny how cats grow up and still are afraid of the “boogie man”.
    Clownz

  7. NaledgeState says:

    @MoorFedayeen
    Tyranny? From who…Britain? Go back and make your comment relavent to the 21st century. It’s funny how cats grow up and still are afraid of the “boogie man”.
    Clownz

  8. Brotha Noompsey says:

    This is the definition of militia per Meriam Webster dictionary——–a group of people who are not part of the armed forces of a country but are trained like soldiers. The Militia is the citizenry Bob not the military. The 2nd amendment is for one reason and one reason only, to give the people a fighting chance if government turns on the people and imposes tyranny. It’s not there for the right to hunt or sport shoot. Liberals refuse to see that. All throughout the 20th century we have so many example of government taking the guns from the people and millions being slaughtered. Hitler took the guns first, so did Stalin and Mao, and Mussolini, and Castro, and Pol pot in Cambodia…The problem is Liberals want to government to control every facet of their lives but I don’t!!!

  9. Brotha Noompsey says:

    This is the definition of militia per Meriam Webster dictionary——–a group of people who are not part of the armed forces of a country but are trained like soldiers. The Militia is the citizenry Bob not the military. The 2nd amendment is for one reason and one reason only, to give the people a fighting chance if government turns on the people and imposes tyranny. It’s not there for the right to hunt or sport shoot. Liberals refuse to see that. All throughout the 20th century we have so many example of government taking the guns from the people and millions being slaughtered. Hitler took the guns first, so did Stalin and Mao, and Mussolini, and Castro, and Pol pot in Cambodia…The problem is Liberals want to government to control every facet of their lives but I don’t!!!

  10. Brotha Noompsey says:

    @NaledgeState  @MoorFedayeen From OUR governemnt Naledge. So many examples of guns being taken away and tyranny and slaughter followed.

  11. Sw ATL made says:

    Hey hahz u in the media u should know that all networks west of the Mississippi start with K and east W there aren’t KABC’s on the east coast atlantas abc channel is wsb and this riverdale is in Utah not The one in clayton county georgia u less he is from georgia and went to Utah

  12. BzB says:

    first of all there’s some irrelevant comments about gun control and the correlation to violence.  if criminals weren’t using guns they’d be using knives or some other type of deadly weapons.  government with tyranny on their minds?  i see the tinfoil hat commentary is here as usual.  the facts are that countries with the strictest gun control laws have the least amount of gun violence.  the US is number 1 for gun violence out of all industrialized countries.  
     
    that said the damage is already done.  the problem we have in our country is there are already 300 million guns on the streets. enough to arm almost every man, woman and child.  you can legally buy guns easily in the south then drive them to any other city.  not to mention buying guns online, or the illegal gun trade.  america is one of the easiest places in the world to get a gun.  that’s why guns are prevalent in cities that have strict gun laws.
     
    as for whether a black man could get away with what this guy was doing in the video…possibly, but he would probably asked to leave.  stores are private property and they can have their own rules on what is acceptable or not as long as it doesn’t violate federal laws.

    • RasheedLateef says:

      @BzB lol @tinfoil hat. @moor is a cool guy,he’s just a cold cactus at times haha. as for the video up top,yeah i’d be nervous too if i saw that while shopping or something.

      • BzB says:

        @RasheedLateef   it would make me nervous too.  i’d avoid a person carrying out in the open.  just brings unwanted attn and may cause a confrontation that would result in a shooting.  
         
        or an accidental shooting…which happens all the time. this type of attn wh0ring or trying to prove a point is unnecessary.
         
        i’m all for gun rights, have a ccw, and firearms of my own but i think more can be done to keep guns out of the wrong people’s hands.  i’ll be honest in saying i don’t know the answer…

  13. BzB says:

    first of all there’s some irrelevant comments about gun control and the correlation to violence.  if criminals weren’t using guns they’d be using knives or some other type of deadly weapons.  government with tyranny on their minds?  i see the tinfoil hat commentary is here as usual.  the facts are that countries with the strictest gun control laws have the least amount of gun violence.  the US is number 1 for gun violence out of all industrialized countries.  
     
    that said the damage is already done.  the problem we have in our country is there are already 300 million guns on the streets. enough to arm almost every man, woman and child.  you can legally buy guns easily in the south then drive them to any other city.  not to mention buying guns online, or the illegal gun trade.  america is one of the easiest places in the world to get a gun.  that’s why guns are prevalent in cities that have strict gun laws.
     
    as for whether a black man could get away with what this guy was doing in the video…possibly, but he would probably asked to leave.  stores are private property and they can have their own rules on what is acceptable or not as long as it doesn’t violate federal laws.

  14. MoorFedayeen says:

    @Brotha Noompsey  @NaledgeState My brotha Noompsey said it best.
     
    Real n1ggas gonna agree while pussi n1ggas gonna sneak diss. If you ya coward azz don’t like guns then don’t buy one

  15. NaledgeState says:

    @Brotha Noompsey
    You’re a moron just like that clown Moor. Tyranny from who? Give me an example of how the government is being tyrannical?
    You mean like how conceal & carry laws are expanding throughout the Union, and how you can carry guns into many state parks (signed by Obama), plus this current adminstration did not seek to renew the assault rifles ban that expired.
    This current adminstration deserves a f**king “F” as far as gun control, but yet here comes Obama coming to take your guns. It’s sad that idiots like you are drowning out the voices of rational gun owners who own guns to protect them & theirs, and not from some fictitous Obama army siezing peoples guns.
    Y’all some idiots who make rational gun owners

  16. NaledgeState says:

    …. people who are scared of the “boogie man” when in fact, they own guns to proctect themselves from real perceived dangers.

  17. BzB says:

    you guys have to stop being so thick headed and stop using the reason we need guns is for protecting ourselves against the gov.  your examples are poor and sorely outdated. 
     
    …in the technology age guns are useless against a gov that wants to control it’s people.  they control energy, water, food, transportation, communication…a bunch of stuff that our guns have no power against.  that’s all they need to control the people.  
     
    our guns might as well be spitballs against the type of weapons at their disposal.   raw firepower, biological, chemical weapons.  not to mention municipalities as mentioned earlier.  
     
    you guys have your priorities out of order.  our power isn’t in guns…it’s in education, representation and involvement.  but keep believing otherwise.  they want you to believe because you have guns you have power.  wrong!

  18. MoorFedayeen says:

    @BzB I’m trying to speak to you like a man Bzb cause I think you a hell of a lot smarter then Prest and OneSlug combined. F#ck them n1ggas. You’re right. I’ve said the same thing in other post. They could trigger another Katrina like disaster or release a pandemic and watch us tear each other apart but what about the preppers that have food, weapons and a plan in wait? I know we’re up against a lot but as many ppl say, weapons at least give us a chance to fight back. Can we at least have that?
     
    You want a good example the just look to Egypt. Those ppl have been disarmed so they nothing but rocks to throw when they’re shot at. On the other hand America thinks twice before taking their azzes back to Somalia after 19 of theirs were killed and plenty other injured in a conflict.

  19. BzB says:

    you mention egypt, but to counter that look at a country like iraq…they have one of the highest per capita ownership of guns in the world.  yet saddam was still sh1tt1ng on them all the time.  why?  cause he wasn’t afraid to gas they azz and they knew it.  he would also send the tanks in or kidnap and terrorize people who opposed him.  basically their choppers didn’t matter…
     
    i’ve said it before…guns have their place in self-defense or in defense of one’s community against trouble makers or ill intentioned peers.  not to be confused with a means of overthrowing the gov though.  militias have their place, when their intentions are as mentioned.  that’s where some of these militia groups have a leg up on us.  they plan and prep for martial law to protect their communities.  the gov is ok with that as long as they stay in their place.  as soon as they start targeting gov interest or acting brand new like they don’t know the rules they get whacked like them waco cats got took out.

  20. MoorFedayeen says:

    @BzB Bro don’t talk about Iraq unless you have Iraqi friends that you chilled with everyday like I did. Remember I lived in Dearborn MI, the largest Arab population in America so I know the REAL news on Iraq.
     
    Saddam was no more brutal then Bush, Clinton or Obama. That man had the best health care in the middle east including Israel and from what I was told, they had better services then the city of Detroit, meaning their roads weren’t all f*cked up. Stop listening to western media. Those ppl were way better off with Saddam in power. America lied about what they had. No WMDs. Now Iraq is in ruinsand a nest for terrorist and easy target for Iran to invade.Thanks
     
    But I’ll still use them as an example. Because they were well armed this tiny country was able to fend off America and NATO killing tens of thousands of coalition, including more then 4000 US troops. My point still stands on its own. An armed citizen is far better off then one that is not. Peace

  21. MoorFedayeen says:

    @BzB And Waco is also a good example. American cowards had to set the damn place on fire killing dozens of woman and children because they became frustrated. That was punk sh1t and that’s all the govt could do with those ppl. That aint your best example. You co-sign what America did to those ppl?

  22. BzB says:

    @MoorFedayeen  the main reason i referenced iraq is because that is a country where they had an evil dictator and the people there tried to overthrow the gov.  they have a bunch of guns, but no matter how many guns they had it wasn’t going to work because the gov had absolute power and wasn’t afraid to use it.
     
    and how can you say saddam was no more brutal than obama?  come on @moor..you know better than that.  obama never sent rape gangs out to terrorize dissidents.  obama never used mustard gas and nerve agents on americans.  a bunch of other stuff saddam did out in the open and dgaf.  who knows what he was doing down in the dungeon.  saddam was way more brutal than any america president just by using those facts.
     
    and this isn’t all second hand information.  i worked with a kurdish contractor a few years back and she verified what we hear about saddam isn’t fiction.  that dude was a monster and ruled with an iron fist!  
     
    iraqis killed thousands of us troops, but how many iraqis were killed?  tens of thousands.  plus we shouldn’t have been there in the first place.  it was a failed war from the start, that i agree with. 
     
    ——
     
    as for waco, that was an example of how the gov will take out anyone who doesn’t play by the rules.  those people were well armed and fought off the local pd, but once they sent in the fbi it was a wrap.  i’m not saying it was right, i’m saying that’s an example of how civilians arms don’t stand a chance.

  23. MoorFedayeen says:

    @BzB I started not to reply because this post is growing old but you’re wrong on a few things and I want you to fact check them right after reading this. From the start, ATF which is federal made contact with the Branch in the small city 9 miles from Waco and they were repelled. What the ATF did was cowardly and criminal to say the least. That was flat out a mass murder and it didn’t take much courage to burn a place down as folks were inside. Just wanted to clear that up. Local wasn’t involved. ATF was.
     
    Far as Iraq, you didn’t even say anything on the health care facts or the state of the country after the invasion. They’re far worse off. And what could a Kurd tell you better about Iraq then an actual Iraqi? That would be like a Canadian telling me an opinion about America or a WSHH user telling me about ANS. Trust and believe, Saddam was much better for his country then anyone and many did die defending the country as many did in Vietnam but they still fended the invaders off. That’s my whole point. Who cares if you die, long as you win.
     
    And Saddam was no worse then America when you revisit our brutality against blacks, Natives and Hispanics that still continues today. He’s far less worse. Talk to folks and find out the real truth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Wordpress SEO Plugin by SEOPressor